<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Haven&#8217;t been posting much</title>
	<link>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Recommended Reads through April 3rd at Faux Real</title>
		<link>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2687</link>
		<author>Recommended Reads through April 3rd at Faux Real</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2687</guid>
		<description>[...] When the Narrative is &#8220;Who Gets To Be First?&#8221; - If the Dem candidate loses in November, Hillary Clinton (and women) will get the blame for it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] When the Narrative is &#8220;Who Gets To Be First?&#8221; - If the Dem candidate loses in November, Hillary Clinton (and women) will get the blame for it. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zuzu</title>
		<link>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2617</link>
		<author>Zuzu</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2617</guid>
		<description>Part of the problem is that I haven't been online and/or posting all that much anyway, so when I do post something, threads get derailed immediately with the tu quoques:  "Why haven't you posted anything about this other nasty rumor that I heard Hillary did?  What are you, racist? You're in the tank for her! Admit it!"

I mean, Melissa has been scrupulously fair about covering the *issues* without attacking the *candidates* and she still gets called out on this all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the problem is that I haven&#8217;t been online and/or posting all that much anyway, so when I do post something, threads get derailed immediately with the tu quoques:  &#8220;Why haven&#8217;t you posted anything about this other nasty rumor that I heard Hillary did?  What are you, racist? You&#8217;re in the tank for her! Admit it!&#8221;</p>
<p>I mean, Melissa has been scrupulously fair about covering the *issues* without attacking the *candidates* and she still gets called out on this all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Harding</title>
		<link>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2615</link>
		<author>Kate Harding</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2615</guid>
		<description>I wish you'd been blogging more about this but totally understand why you haven't. I've been appreciating your comments at Shakesville, though. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish you&#8217;d been blogging more about this but totally understand why you haven&#8217;t. I&#8217;ve been appreciating your comments at Shakesville, though. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tricia</title>
		<link>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2614</link>
		<author>Tricia</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2614</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Really, not trolling, just suggesting some points for you to consider.&lt;/i&gt;

Really, zuzu, it's not like you've actually put any thought into your posts or been keeping up with the news or anything. /sarcasm

That right there is why I've been tearing my hair out -- the steaming piles of condescension. 

...just "gah!" and thank you for not giving up completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Really, not trolling, just suggesting some points for you to consider.</i></p>
<p>Really, zuzu, it&#8217;s not like you&#8217;ve actually put any thought into your posts or been keeping up with the news or anything. /sarcasm</p>
<p>That right there is why I&#8217;ve been tearing my hair out &#8212; the steaming piles of condescension. </p>
<p>&#8230;just &#8220;gah!&#8221; and thank you for not giving up completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn Gazis-Sax</title>
		<link>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2611</link>
		<author>Lynn Gazis-Sax</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2611</guid>
		<description>I'm where I've been all along in this campaign - on balance preferring Obama (I voted for him, not apologizing for that vote), but not, I think, hero worshipping him, and still liking Clinton as well.  Some of the complaints about racism seem overblown to me ("fairy tale" really does read as a reference to whether Obama's Iraq record is all that different from Sen. Clinton's, Kos seems to be wrong, and too cavalier in making a serious charge, about the darkened face in the photo, the 3AM ad may be fear mongering, but ordinary fear mongering positioning Clinton as more experienced and hawkish, not special racist fear mongering).  Some complaints have been reasonable (the whole &lt;em&gt;series&lt;/em&gt; of Clinton surrogate statements right before the South Carolina was starting to look bad, though I'm satisfied she put a stop to it, and Ferraro &lt;em&gt;was&lt;/em&gt; out of line suggesting Obama only got so far because he was black, remarks that kind of deserved Ezra's mocking response).

And most of the really misogynist or racist stuff that's been coming up seems to me to be either coming from loose cannon supporters that neither campaign can really control, or from the right where you'd expect it.

But neither actual &lt;em&gt;candidate&lt;/em&gt; has crossed any lines that would prevent me from very willingly voting for either over McCain in the fall.  They're both pols, but they're both pols that will get me better policies than McCain would, bottom line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m where I&#8217;ve been all along in this campaign - on balance preferring Obama (I voted for him, not apologizing for that vote), but not, I think, hero worshipping him, and still liking Clinton as well.  Some of the complaints about racism seem overblown to me (&#8221;fairy tale&#8221; really does read as a reference to whether Obama&#8217;s Iraq record is all that different from Sen. Clinton&#8217;s, Kos seems to be wrong, and too cavalier in making a serious charge, about the darkened face in the photo, the 3AM ad may be fear mongering, but ordinary fear mongering positioning Clinton as more experienced and hawkish, not special racist fear mongering).  Some complaints have been reasonable (the whole <em>series</em> of Clinton surrogate statements right before the South Carolina was starting to look bad, though I&#8217;m satisfied she put a stop to it, and Ferraro <em>was</em> out of line suggesting Obama only got so far because he was black, remarks that kind of deserved Ezra&#8217;s mocking response).</p>
<p>And most of the really misogynist or racist stuff that&#8217;s been coming up seems to me to be either coming from loose cannon supporters that neither campaign can really control, or from the right where you&#8217;d expect it.</p>
<p>But neither actual <em>candidate</em> has crossed any lines that would prevent me from very willingly voting for either over McCain in the fall.  They&#8217;re both pols, but they&#8217;re both pols that will get me better policies than McCain would, bottom line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zuzu</title>
		<link>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2610</link>
		<author>Zuzu</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2610</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Dave.  &lt;a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/183228.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;Here's what Marshall said:&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;If Obama's the nominee, we will see no end of this kind of stuff. And there's probably some small benefit of getting a preview. &lt;b&gt;But the simple fact is that we wouldn't be seeing this stuff now if it weren't for the fact that this is the kind of campaign Hillary Clinton's campaign has decided to wage -- often directly and at other times indirectly by not reining it in in her supporters when it crops up on its own. Wright is news today because Ferraro's been news yesterday. &lt;/b&gt;Are her comments racist? That's a loaded, too copious, word. And there've been cases where the Clinton team has gotten a bum rap on these matters. What I do know, however, is that Clinton's campaign and her surrogates have injected the subject of Obama's race into this campaign too many times now for it to be credible to believe that it is anything but a conscious strategy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

IOW, Marshall's blaming Clinton for Wright, as if she wrote his sermons or she was the one who pushed this story.  And like Ezra Klein, who so breezily assumed that this was a "Clinton oppo dump," Marshall didn't check his facts.  Sean Hannity's been flogging this story for a long time, and ABC News got its own videos.  Obama himself tried to put a lid on Wright last year and minimized his public presence.  

And the Josh Marshall of last year would have checked his facts (Ezra, I'm not so sure about).  But he's in the tank for Obama now, so he just passes along every unsubstantiated rumor that she's the really really bad one and she's the only one who's gone negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Dave.  <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/183228.php" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s what Marshall said:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>If Obama&#8217;s the nominee, we will see no end of this kind of stuff. And there&#8217;s probably some small benefit of getting a preview. <b>But the simple fact is that we wouldn&#8217;t be seeing this stuff now if it weren&#8217;t for the fact that this is the kind of campaign Hillary Clinton&#8217;s campaign has decided to wage &#8212; often directly and at other times indirectly by not reining it in in her supporters when it crops up on its own. Wright is news today because Ferraro&#8217;s been news yesterday. </b>Are her comments racist? That&#8217;s a loaded, too copious, word. And there&#8217;ve been cases where the Clinton team has gotten a bum rap on these matters. What I do know, however, is that Clinton&#8217;s campaign and her surrogates have injected the subject of Obama&#8217;s race into this campaign too many times now for it to be credible to believe that it is anything but a conscious strategy.</p></blockquote>
<p>IOW, Marshall&#8217;s blaming Clinton for Wright, as if she wrote his sermons or she was the one who pushed this story.  And like Ezra Klein, who so breezily assumed that this was a &#8220;Clinton oppo dump,&#8221; Marshall didn&#8217;t check his facts.  Sean Hannity&#8217;s been flogging this story for a long time, and ABC News got its own videos.  Obama himself tried to put a lid on Wright last year and minimized his public presence.  </p>
<p>And the Josh Marshall of last year would have checked his facts (Ezra, I&#8217;m not so sure about).  But he&#8217;s in the tank for Obama now, so he just passes along every unsubstantiated rumor that she&#8217;s the really really bad one and she&#8217;s the only one who&#8217;s gone negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CLD</title>
		<link>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2609</link>
		<author>CLD</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2609</guid>
		<description>Great post, Zuzu. I completely understand what you're saying. And you certainly don't need to keep reiterating your point so that others "get it". You've left enough bread crumbs that they ought to be able to figure it out themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Zuzu. I completely understand what you&#8217;re saying. And you certainly don&#8217;t need to keep reiterating your point so that others &#8220;get it&#8221;. You&#8217;ve left enough bread crumbs that they ought to be able to figure it out themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous dave</title>
		<link>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2608</link>
		<author>anonymous dave</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2608</guid>
		<description>I don't watch tv, so I haven't seen Olbermann on this, and I haven't read Ezra Klein.  But if your argument is that Josh Marshall is misogynistic, or unfair to Clinton, then I think you might be projecting too much here.  Marshall has been pretty diligent about calling out nonsense from supporters of both camps.  His statement, if i remember correctly, was not that Clinton was behind the Wright brouhaha, but rather that it only was news because Ferraro's comments had made news the preceding few days, and he blamed Clinton's campaign for it's tepid response to those.  Incidentally, so do I, mostly because they were stupid.
I don't know the veracity of the Houston writer's claims (and I wonder if you do), but I do know that Obama wrote far more legislation than Clinton has (although it is true that most of that did not pas the Illinois legislature).  Even without that, his senate experience does not pale in comparison to hers.  On the other hand, McCain has a shitload more experience than both of them; hopefully, you'd not argue that makes him a better candidate.  I'm sorry that overly zealous supporters have subjected you to gender bashing.  I don't think you'll have to worry about Clinton getting blamed for McCain's presidency, because Obama will beat him.  The majority of voters are not going to support McCain's embrace of the current fiasco.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t watch tv, so I haven&#8217;t seen Olbermann on this, and I haven&#8217;t read Ezra Klein.  But if your argument is that Josh Marshall is misogynistic, or unfair to Clinton, then I think you might be projecting too much here.  Marshall has been pretty diligent about calling out nonsense from supporters of both camps.  His statement, if i remember correctly, was not that Clinton was behind the Wright brouhaha, but rather that it only was news because Ferraro&#8217;s comments had made news the preceding few days, and he blamed Clinton&#8217;s campaign for it&#8217;s tepid response to those.  Incidentally, so do I, mostly because they were stupid.<br />
I don&#8217;t know the veracity of the Houston writer&#8217;s claims (and I wonder if you do), but I do know that Obama wrote far more legislation than Clinton has (although it is true that most of that did not pas the Illinois legislature).  Even without that, his senate experience does not pale in comparison to hers.  On the other hand, McCain has a shitload more experience than both of them; hopefully, you&#8217;d not argue that makes him a better candidate.  I&#8217;m sorry that overly zealous supporters have subjected you to gender bashing.  I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll have to worry about Clinton getting blamed for McCain&#8217;s presidency, because Obama will beat him.  The majority of voters are not going to support McCain&#8217;s embrace of the current fiasco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zuzu</title>
		<link>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2607</link>
		<author>Zuzu</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2607</guid>
		<description>In fact, see &lt;a href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/03/16/10/10/heh-34/#comment-138566" rel="nofollow"&gt;Susie Madrak's comment here&lt;/a&gt; for a good example of what I'm talking about:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m not trying to persuade you to vote for either of them. I don’t care which one gets the nomination at this point, they’re both mortally wounded by the racism charges. I hope I’m wrong but I don’t see how either of them can win now.

What I DO insist on, however, is that you don’t idealize Obama. He’s a politician, one with very conservative advisers. If that’s what you want, have at it - but don’t say no one ever told you.

And what does piss me off is the online bullying of Hillary Clinton and her supporters. It reeks of the schoolyard. I have no great love for the woman but she’s a decent person - and a decent enough Democrat. I respect her even though we don’t always agree.

And I won’t stand by quietly while a perfectly good Democrat who may, in fact, become the nominee, is ripped apart for the ego gratification of anonymous cowards.

Apparently you think this is “just” me when I’m only one of the few who will say it out loud. You don’t know what other bloggers are saying behind the scenes because they’re too intimidated to say it publicly. They see the way bloggers who stand up for Clinton are treated.

Yay for the online “community”!&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, see <a href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/03/16/10/10/heh-34/#comment-138566" rel="nofollow">Susie Madrak&#8217;s comment here</a> for a good example of what I&#8217;m talking about:</p>
<blockquote><p>I’m not trying to persuade you to vote for either of them. I don’t care which one gets the nomination at this point, they’re both mortally wounded by the racism charges. I hope I’m wrong but I don’t see how either of them can win now.</p>
<p>What I DO insist on, however, is that you don’t idealize Obama. He’s a politician, one with very conservative advisers. If that’s what you want, have at it - but don’t say no one ever told you.</p>
<p>And what does piss me off is the online bullying of Hillary Clinton and her supporters. It reeks of the schoolyard. I have no great love for the woman but she’s a decent person - and a decent enough Democrat. I respect her even though we don’t always agree.</p>
<p>And I won’t stand by quietly while a perfectly good Democrat who may, in fact, become the nominee, is ripped apart for the ego gratification of anonymous cowards.</p>
<p>Apparently you think this is “just” me when I’m only one of the few who will say it out loud. You don’t know what other bloggers are saying behind the scenes because they’re too intimidated to say it publicly. They see the way bloggers who stand up for Clinton are treated.</p>
<p>Yay for the online “community”!</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zuzu</title>
		<link>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2606</link>
		<author>Zuzu</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kindlypogmothoin.com/2008/03/15/havent-been-posting-much/#comment-2606</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Unless you don’t count his work in the Illinois legislature (it is, after all, public work as an elected official), Obama has far more in the way of accomplishments than Clinton.&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, I don't count his work in the Illinois legislature for much.  The first five years he was there, he got nothing passed because the legislature was under Republican control, and in his final year, he was given credit for a whole lot of bills that he didn't do the work on, because there was a &lt;a href="http://blogs.houstonpress.com/houstoned/2008/02/cover_story_barack_obama_and_m.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;kingmaker&lt;/a&gt;  helping him out.

As for the rest of your points, I don't really care who went negative first.  It's politics; people go negative.  I think that a lot of the "racial" stuff is overblown (i.e., the "fairytale" stuff.  Hello?) and/or pushed by people like Kos.  

However, I'm also not talking about the campaigns as much as I am the supporters.  And there's gleeful gender bashing aplenty.  &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqrNE3HGrsI&#038;eurl=http://www.correntewire.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;This guy&lt;/a&gt; is fairly representative of the kind of thing I'm talking about.  And then you have people like Keith Olbermann, or Josh Marshall and Ezra Klein, who just casually smear Clinton by uncritically passing on their assumption that she was behind the Wright thing getting out -- even though ABC News made it known that they purchased the Wright DVDs from Wright's own website, and Fox has been hammering this for quite some time now.

Some of the best commentary on the raw, naked misogyny of Obama supporters in the blogosphere and in the media comes from a couple of people who hate Clinton, Avedon Carol and Susie Madrak.  Somehow, they're able to separate how they feel about Clinton's accomplishments and record and how they view misogyny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Unless you don’t count his work in the Illinois legislature (it is, after all, public work as an elected official), Obama has far more in the way of accomplishments than Clinton.</i></p>
<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t count his work in the Illinois legislature for much.  The first five years he was there, he got nothing passed because the legislature was under Republican control, and in his final year, he was given credit for a whole lot of bills that he didn&#8217;t do the work on, because there was a <a href="http://blogs.houstonpress.com/houstoned/2008/02/cover_story_barack_obama_and_m.php" rel="nofollow">kingmaker</a>  helping him out.</p>
<p>As for the rest of your points, I don&#8217;t really care who went negative first.  It&#8217;s politics; people go negative.  I think that a lot of the &#8220;racial&#8221; stuff is overblown (i.e., the &#8220;fairytale&#8221; stuff.  Hello?) and/or pushed by people like Kos.  </p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m also not talking about the campaigns as much as I am the supporters.  And there&#8217;s gleeful gender bashing aplenty.  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqrNE3HGrsI&#038;eurl=http://www.correntewire.com/" rel="nofollow">This guy</a> is fairly representative of the kind of thing I&#8217;m talking about.  And then you have people like Keith Olbermann, or Josh Marshall and Ezra Klein, who just casually smear Clinton by uncritically passing on their assumption that she was behind the Wright thing getting out &#8212; even though ABC News made it known that they purchased the Wright DVDs from Wright&#8217;s own website, and Fox has been hammering this for quite some time now.</p>
<p>Some of the best commentary on the raw, naked misogyny of Obama supporters in the blogosphere and in the media comes from a couple of people who hate Clinton, Avedon Carol and Susie Madrak.  Somehow, they&#8217;re able to separate how they feel about Clinton&#8217;s accomplishments and record and how they view misogyny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
