Titsling!

What is there to say about this article (via) that hasn’t already been said better by Lauredhel?

So, I think I’ll just give you a video that seems quite apropos:

5 Responses to “Titsling!”


  1. 1 FashionablyEvil

    Underwires vs. surgery…hmmm…

    I think I’ll take things poking me in the ribs over invasive surgery.

  2. 2 Mnemosyne

    I was pretty amazed by all of the people at Feministe who actually bought the hype that having wires strung from your ribcage is less invasive than having a silicone pouch pushed into your breast. Yes, apparently having bone screws put into your chest is, like, totally noninvasive!

    Sheesh.

  3. 3 Zuzu

    And wouldn’t the cables be visible? There are an awful lot of women who have so little fat on their chests that you can clearly see their implants; imagine, if you will, being able to see the cables.

    Then, of course, there’s the question of whether the cables will slice into the pectorals.

  4. 4 lauredhel

    I was amazed at that too, Mnemosyne. And as far as I can see there would be no way to make this device invisible, let alone impalpable; it goes between the breast glandular tissue and the skin, and while it might be obscured on someone with a lot of bodyfat, it would be bound to show if/when you’re a bit smaller. Along with the pain and function issues and complications that will result, if they ever get past the piggy-rib-bra stage and start installing these into humans.

    Then there was the assumption that male aesthetic surgeons are interested in improving women’s _comfort_ when devising rib-slung perkomatics for teenagers.

    (Thanks for the link, zuzu!)

  5. 5 kcb

    If this thing fits and feels like the average external bra, it’s gonna be a nightmare.

    When do you suppose they’ll make an internal beer-gut girdle for dudes?
    My guess is never.

Leave a Reply